Welcome! Sign in to access your account. New user?

User: justaboy



Click through to message forum for reply and admin options.
Posted in Have you been kicked in the balls on 2007-04-21 15:16:20

I just got it bad today. We had a party, and one of my parents' friends has a really pretty 17-year old daughter. She was wearing a pair of non-tight jeans that still somehow brought out the full shape of her $%!@ (VERY NICE,BY THE WAY!). She went to the cooler to get a soda and when she bent down to get it, her T-shirt went up and I saw the red elastic band of her panties, as well as a little bit of the actual underwear (it was white). Later, she was on a stool and was leaning forward. I was standing behind her and again I saw her panties riding up and this time I saw more of her panties. Then she turned around and realized her underwear was showing and I was looking. She spun around, cussed at me and punched me in the balls really hard! I held my balls in pain and bent forward, accidentally putting my face right into her chest. She got $%!@ed even more, stood up and kneed me in the balls. But damnit, it was worth it!

Posted in The ultimate battle of the sexes! on 2006-09-16 12:10:19

Are you a punk rock chick? 'cause if you are, that's PERFECT!

Posted in The ultimate battle of the sexes! on 2006-08-22 08:56:05

you're funny... I like you.

Posted in Have you been kicked in the balls on 2006-08-19 13:40:40

In response to the girls not having balls bit: I agree. You girls do have an advantage by not having balls. However that is only ONE advantage. A single advantage is not enough evidence to prove that girls are superior.

As for the girls living longer bit: you call that an advantage? I call that a curse. In a world full of war, disease and suffering, the sooner you die the better. So my take, is that we boys have an ADVANTAGE in dying sooner, 'cause it simply means we don't have to endure the evils of humanity as long as you girls do.

And finally, as for the girls not needing men bit, it's true on occasion, but not all the time. On the other hand, there are also girls who overrely on men, called "golddiggers". And I hate to break it to you, Kellykitten, but there ARE men who don't need women to survive. Sir Paul McCartney recently divorced his wife Heather, and he's doing well; Heather on the other hand, to quote Carlos Mencia, "does not have a leg to stand on". I bet she's really kicking herself for leaving Paul.

So my take? Sure not having balls is an advantage, but that's it really. ONE advantage; really not much to go on, is it?

Best Regards, "justaboy".

PS: You may have some unpractical ideals, Kitten, but the fact that you stand by them despite their lack of commonsense is an admirable trait.


Posted in The ultimate battle of the sexes! on 2006-08-19 01:32:33

What do you mean "no joke"? You have to admit that thing about 'couplins' was pretty original. If you don't think this is funny, you must have a very limited sense of humor... MAN.