Welcome! Sign in to access your account. New user?

Push Poll

1 entry found for push poll Main Entry: push poll Part of Speech noun Definition: an opinion poll done with loaded questions or offering negative information to sway the opinions of those polled
Are you a.....
In 1992, the United States sent Marines to Somalia as part of a United Nations peacekeeping force (Operation Restore Hope) providing food to millions of starving people. Due to a civil war that had cost the lives of more than 300,000 people, international intervention was more than warranted. ask Force Ranger was sent to Somalia with the primary mission of arresting warlord Mohamed Farah Aidid and his fellow clansmen for crimes against humanity. Although the Rangers and Delta Forces sustained heavy casualties, they had accomplished their objective, having taken important rebel leaders prisoner. Was the Battle of the Black Sea a success?
Yes (They compleated all of thier objectives)
No (I did not read or chose to ignore the above text)
In 1995, the CIA and the FBI learned that Osama bin Laden was planning to hijack U.S. airliners and use them as bombs to attack important targets in the U.S. This scheme was called Project Bojinka. It was discovered in the Philippines, where authorities arrested two of bin Laden's agents, Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Hakim Murad. They were involved in planting a bomb on a Philippine airliner. Project Bojinka, which Philip-pine authorities found outlined on Abdul Murad's laptop, called for planting bombs on eleven U.S. airliners and hijacking others and crashing them into targets like the CIA building. "Arab and African affairs, has concluded that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden have been nurtured and encouraged by elements of the U.S. intelligence community, especially during the Clinton years." Clinton was also given Bin Ladin by the Saudi Arabian Government and he allowed him to be released into Afgahnistan Is clinton largely responsable for 9/11?
No (people are not responsible for letting go known terrorists)
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 lots of other people thougth Iraq had WMD's was Bush an idiot to belive that they did?
Yes (people who listen to the CIA and dozens of past leaders are always dumb)
President Clinton was impeached for purgery a crime which he admitted to have committed, should he have been convicted?
No (liberal presidents should not be held guilty for the crimes they commit even
The Rebublican platform is small government and low tax rates. Do you agree with this ideology?
Yes (like low tax rates, and the governtment should pretty much leave me a lone
No (I am to stupid or otherwise incopetent to take care of my self and must have
The Democratic Party's platform is on higher taxes and more govenrment services. Do you agree with this idology?
Yes (I do not like to make my own decisions... too complicated for me!)
No (Why does the government think it knows how to run my life?)
The Libertarian party belives in very little government, and hardly any services, this lets people do things the way they want. Do you agree with this ideology?
Yes (the govenment should only provide very basic services.)
No (I hate freedom and want to make people do it all my way!)
FDR's new deal was deemed to unconstitutionally take away the people's rights by the supream court, and then was later passed when several justices died. Should we get rid of these laws?
Yes (restore freedom to the people!)
No (these laws help the lazy and idle! without them, we would have to FIND A JOB
Social Security (FDR again) requires employers to pay 7% of each employee's salary. This incourages the highering of illegal immigrants over US workers, and the outsoucing of American Jobs. Should we get rid of Social Security?
Yes (take the burdon off of US employers and let them higher more people!)
No (Stifle the economy! it is our job to provide jobs to the illegals)
Social Security has employers pay 7% so if you are self emploied you pay 14% this discourages self employment. Should we get rid of social Security?
Yes (Take the burdon off of small buissness owners and let the free market work!
No (I think that people should just work for Wal*Mart)
People actually get less money back out of social security than they put in. you would get more money if you put it under your pillow. Sould we get rid of social security?
Yes (stop taking people's money let them make their own choices)
No (some of us are too stupid or irrisponsable to save for ourselves)
Should we scrap social security?
Some people do not receive help from their parents for college (like me dang it!) should it require parental financial information for student loans when a person is over 18?
No (They are just as much of a person as someone with poor parents)
Yes (I want to create a demo-economic war! lets kill all of the Aristocrats! )
The American Indians never called themselves "Native Americans" and any one born in Both of the American Continents is technically a Native American, so should we continue to call the American Indians by this name?
No (that would be just dumb, it isnt even correct much less politically correct)
Yes (We must call them by this name we have decied to give them)
If Ward Churchill is protected by the first amendment to call the victims of the 9/11 attacks little Eichmanns then is having a Columbus day parade protected too?
Yes (If he cas celibrate mass murder we can celibrate discovery.)
No (you can only have differnt ideas if they are ours!)
This poll was created on 2006-05-24 21:25:04 by Kelo