Welcome! Sign in to access your account. New user?
ADULT: OFF HOME DIRECTORY SEARCH RANDOM POLL MAKE A POLL

Female vs Male nudity in movies

No vagina, please

Posted by Colorado guy on 2004-03-20 22:12:56

OK I may sound like a religious freak but I believe the Bible teaches a woman shouldn't expose her labia/vulva/vagina to anyone of the opposite sex except her man. That's why God gave women pubic hair, so it wouldn't show during casual nudity.

Posted by Pronatalist on 2004-03-31 18:37:22

Well I'm not so sure about the latter part, the purpose of pubic hair, but I do think it gross to shave off pubic hair. People look more sexy more natural-like, as God apparently intended, and not all altered as if people don't know who they are, or want to compare to those stupid porno flicks. I also don't like tattoos and body piecings, as they are gross mutilations of the body, which are totally unnecessary. Make up and high heels are uncomfortable, inpractical, and superficial too.

And I do think showing the $%!@ in a movie, is more provocative than breasts, as it is more suggestive that humans should be $%!@ing and making babies. But on the other side, what's the difference between showing breast, or the $%!@?

It's not so much the sexual stuff that offends me, but the vulgarness and immorality that so often comes with it. Hardly ever is it husband and wife, with proper, natural affections for each other. And then, shouldn't such stuff be more private and perhaps more suggestive, and less explicit?

========== In Reply To ========== OK I may sound like a religious freak but I believe the Bible teaches a woman shouldn't expose her labia/vulva/vagina to anyone of the opposite sex except her man. That's why God gave women pubic hair, so it wouldn't show during casual nudity.