User: Zauriel
I totally agree about bringing back extinct animals who died by our hands.
But i disagree about humans. The ends justify the means.
========== In Reply To ========== I think cloning a human,no matter what way you put it,is wrong,even if you do not believe in a higher power,still,that is something that we should not have control over,if you want a clone,try and have,and/or adopt twins,they wont be perfect clones but better tan going against nature.I think we absolutely should clone extinct animals that we wiped out like the Dodo Bird,and to clone animals that are endangered,but we shouldnt bring back animals that were destroyed by nature,cause I don't want to see no Jurrassic Park.
cool
========== In Reply To ========== I am a clone, I am not alone Every fiber of my flesh and bone is identical to the others. Everything I say and do is in the same tone as my test-tube brother's voice There is no choice between us while you rejoice in your uniqueness Being a clone, I have no flaws to identify Even this doggerel that pours from my pen has just been written by another twenty thousand telepathic men and it says "oh for the wings of any bird other than a battery hen" But that's the spirit of the age....
Hawkwind, from Spirit of the Age
I agree.
========== In Reply To ========== I think cloning people is WRONG! But using a cloning process to bring back extinct animals is a good idea, since is is one of 2 ways. Cloning normal animals that are endangered or not should also ot be done.
I only supports the cloning process if it is to bring back extinct animals (ie the mammoth)
Yes, that is correct. There are seven archangels: Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, Uriel, Sealtiel, Jhudiel and Barachiel
========== In Reply To ==========
Aren't there traditionally supposed to be four or seven archangels?
Only two are named in the Bible - Michael and Gabriel. Raphael appears in
the apocrypha (Book of Tobit) and I think there's another (Uriel?) who
appears in 2 Maccabees (correct me if I'm wrong).
Incidentally, haven't there been quite a few different hierarchies for
angels? They all start Cherubim, Seraphim, and end with Archangels and
Angels, but it seem the in mediaeval times they couldn't make up their
minds the order of seniority of power, dominions, etc.
I also think there's more on angels in the Book of Enoch (which I haven't read - it's not part of either the Bible or the Apocrypha).
Interesting poll, though.
I see what you meant. I take it that you do not agree with Tony Blair?
========== In Reply To ========== I am British, and I hate America. It is a horrible, shallow, brutal, militaristic, environmentally-destructive country which seems to believe it's living on a different planet to the rest of us. I do not hate the American people, however.

) |