User: theshibboleth
| 2003-10-11 | |
| 14 | |
| 17 | |
| 0 |
Polls Created
- A Practical Look at the Election
- 2004-09-03 07:40:58
- Drug and Medication Use
- 2004-05-02 21:18:24
- Basic Political Poll
- 2004-03-22 02:31:15
- Same-Sex Marriage: Only a Thing of the Future?
- 2004-03-03 23:00:07
- The Vegetarian Theory of Politics
- 2004-02-11 07:45:46
- What All Those Anti-Life Abortionists Don't Want You To Know
- 2004-01-19 02:25:34
- DOWN WITH AMERICAN DESPOTISM
- 2004-01-13 05:52:18
- CALIFORNIA SECESSION
- 2004-01-06 12:38:57
- Do You Honestly Think The Greens Spoiled The 2000 Election?
- 2004-01-06 12:29:54
- The Next Best Thing To Making Democracy Work
- 2003-12-31 01:21:15
So you're a $%!@ Cheney fan, I take it?
It is a lie that Nader caused Gore to loose the election. Any possible influence he had in 2000, was limited to Florida. Most of the states are already decided. Gore could have easily won if he had campaigned a little harder, and had not Bush cronies stolen the elction.
========== In Reply To ========== Please dont think that Kerry will walk away with the election because he's winning some cheesey internet polls. While liberals are voting on meaningless polls, conservatives are out getting things done.
Besides, the people on here are in serious denial. Comon, you think Nader WON'T have an effect on Kerry's election? He did on Al Gore, why won't he with Kerry? I know plenty of people who are voting 3rd party. He WILL have an effect.
(Read subject line.)
Couldn't they be one in the same?
Well its not like the Democrats and Republicans aren't inseperable anyway.
Ralph Nader in 2004!
========== In Reply To ========== I think it's time a Democrat and Republican ran on the same ticket. John Kerry and John McCain would make a very popular ticket among veterans especially during a war. I am a Democrat, but I would still support John Kerry if it were a Republican he was running with.

) |