Mister Poll: Is Sarah Palin qualified to be Vice President???

1) Lets just start with the general question. Consider Gramps McCain is 72 and has had lots of major health issues, Sarah Palin will be just a heartbeat away from being commander in cheif. Are you comfortable with that idea? You can select as many options as you want.

1) You are a sexist pig for even bringing up the question (are you one of those folks who have been making misogynist remarks about Hillary by the way?). She is the most qualified person McCain could have picked.

2) I'm sure she'll be o.k. despite the fact that she is inexperienced and doesn't know much about national affairs.

3) Yes. She has had lots of executive experience

4) No. She is too inexperienced on national and foreign issues

5) No. She put her town in debt as mayor. Considering the economic mess that we are in now, I don't think we should take the chance

6) No. She is a habitual liar and theocrat who is incredibly vindictive.

7) Absolutely not!!!

8) Yes. She did a wonderful job as mayor and governor

9) Yes. She talks to god and says it's his will that we went into Iraq and that we drill for oil

10) Other (please post). I know that there are a grizillion more reasons that I am leaving out. I am just having too much fun though to think of everything.

11) Not sure

2) Sarah Palin brags and brags and brags about her never ending opposition to the "Bridge to Nowhere" which is an infamous costly pork barrel project which became sort of a poster child to pork barrel projects. Sounds warm and fuzzy huh? She brags about this alot. One problem. She supported and heavily advocated for this before she opposed it. Do we really need another habitual liar to become president?

1) Actually YOU are lying Totoro. Tell George Soros to give you better talking points. (If you chose this option, please fact check this and explain-I don't even know Soros by the way, I just wanted to try to make some of my right wing pals laugh a bit).

2) She isn't really lying, just stretching the truth a bit. All politicians do that.

3) Well Clinton...blah blah blah, and you liberals...ect ect ect, and Obama is Bl......uh...er...I mean he had this preacher who said ...ect ect.

4) With this lie at the cornerstone of her campaign as well as other ones, how can anyone trust her?

5) This is just one of many lies that Palin spouts. For this and many other reasons, she is NOT qualified to be president.

6) Other. Please post.

7) Not sure

3) Sarah Palin asked for lots and lots of earmarks for both the town she was mayor of, and Alaska. Despite this FACT, McSame and Palin are always going on about how she is so much against earmarks. Palin left Wasilla in about 20 million in debt by the way. Why am I perplexed by all this.

1) Because your obvious left wing bias is clouding your brain!

2) You aren't telling the truth or you are stretching it.

3) McCain and Palin are lying like they have been doing about everything else

4) They are stretching the truth a bit. They have a mixed record. Some reform, and some non-reform

5) How can we trust someone who is such a financial mismanager to be in possible control of the executive branch of this country?

6) Other (please post)

7) Not sure

4) Sarah Palin obviously knows nothing about foreign policy, but her sidekicks and cohorts keep telling us that since Alaska borders Russia, that she is quite the expert on this stuff. About Russia, when asked if we should go to war with Russia if they invade Georgia if it's a member of NATO? "Perhaps". Should we trust Sarah Palin to handle our foreign affairs if Gramps McSame croaks over during his term?

1) Yes! Palin is a true expert on foreign policy and will make great tough decisions.

2) No! Palin is completely ignorant on foreign policy as was made quite obvious in the one interview that she was allowed to have.

3) Other. Please post

4) Not sure

5) Sarah Palin doesn't believe Global Warming is really happening (at least not caused by humans), wants to delist the Polar Bear from the endangered species act, and offers a $150 bounty on the left paws of wolves. What are your views on that.

1) Way to go Sarah. If you don't understand something, shoot it!!

2) Anyone who has that much disregard for the environment that we live in should not be president.

3) Other. Please post

4) Not sure

6) I suppose after all this talk about Reverend Wright, we can talk about Palin's church, can't we? They just held a "Pray away the gay" event based on the false belief that homosexuality is a choice as opposed to an orientation. Her church also advocates a philosophy of drilling in Alaska BECAUSE during the "rapture", all the good Christians will go to Alaska to be raptured up, and they need more oil. Should "pastor" issues apply to Palin as well as Obama?

1) No. It's a very differant situation

2) No. I agree with Palin's pastor.

3) Yes. Palins church is psychotic and cultish. There is reason not to trust Palin if she believes in all that nonsense.

4) Other

5) Not sure

7) Sarah Palin asked a librarian in Wasilla a "rhetorical" question about whether she would ban certain books from the library. After the librarian refused twice, she was fired. While it can't be proven right now that this was the reason, it seems pretty obvious. Should someone who favors censorship of library books be Vice President?

1) As you just admitted, you are kind of stretching it here. Can't you do better than this?

2) Yes. We must censor books so they conform to community standards

3) No. Censoring books is unconstitutional and unamerican

4) No. I don't favor censoring books

5) Other. Please post

6) Not sure

8) What are your political views?

9) How could I forget this one? She is under investigation for inappropriately firing someone. She is refusing to cooperate with the investigation saying that it was "tainted". Sound familiar?

1) What's wrong with not cooperating with investigations? If it's good enough for Karl Rove to ignore subpeonas, why shouldn't Palin do that too. It's excecutive priviledge you know?

2) Palin shouldn't have to cooperate with a "tainted" investigation!

3) Palin is NOT above the law. She should fully cooperate with the investigation. We are not living in a monarchy. There is still something called the "rule of law".

4) Palin should cooperate with the investigation. We shouldn't elect someone to the government who openly ignores this sort of stuff.

5) What would it be like if EVERYONE refused to cooperate in investigations because they are "tainted"?

6) Other. Please post

7) Not sure