Welcome! Sign in to access your account. New user?
HOME DIRECTORY SEARCH RANDOM POLL MAKE A POLL UNCENSORED

Circumcise Your Son?

Looking for the old results?
In the United States, babies are routinely circumcised, despite the fact that there is no medical reason to permanently remove an important part of the boy's genitals. This deals with your opinion on circumcising baby boys and whether or not it should be legal,

Are you male or female?

92% (347) Male
7% (30) Female

377 voters have answered this question.

How old are you?

19% (76) 13-16
23% (88) 17-20
29% (112) 21-30
21% (81) 31-50
6% (24) 51+

381 voters have answered this question.

If male, are you circumcised?

78% (288) Yes
21% (79) No
0% (0) Unsure

367 voters have answered this question.

If you are circumcised, are you happy or would you prefer to be uncircumcised?

81% (243) Happy circumcised
18% (56) Rather be uncircumcised

299 voters have answered this question.

If you are uncircumcised, are you happy to have your foreskin, or would you rather be circumcised

22% (61) Happy to have foreskin
77% (209) Rather be circumcised

270 voters have answered this question.

Circumcised males, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?

79% (247) Circumcise Son
20% (63) Leave Son Uncircumcised/Let Him Choose Later

310 voters have answered this question.

Uncircumcised males, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?

77% (210) Circumcise Son
22% (62) Leave Son Uncircumcised/Let Him Choose Later

272 voters have answered this question.

Females, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?

91% (206) Circumcise Son
8% (18) Leave Son Intact/Let Him Choose Later

224 voters have answered this question.

Should non-religious circumcision of babies be made illegal in the United States unless there is a medical necessity?

21% (75) Yes, make non-religious circumcision of babies illegal unless there is a urgent medical need
78% (282) No, parents have the right to decide whether their son should be circumcised

357 voters have answered this question.

Except in a medical emergency, should a parent be allowed to circumcise a child (ages 5-17) without his consent?

2% (10) Yes, but only for religious reasons
72% (261) Yes, the parent can circumcise the son for any reason (looks, tradition, supposed hygein) as long as
25% (91) No, children above age 5 can make decisions about removing part of their body for themselves.

362 voters have answered this question.

If you would circumcise your son (at birth or as a child) without his consent, check all reasons you would do this.

90% (260) You like the appearance
86% (247) You think it will feel better
80% (231) You are circumcised
9% (27) Your religion requires it
93% (266) You think its cleaner
87% (250) You think girls will like it
76% (220) You don't want him to be made fun of in school
89% (255) You think its healthier
69% (198) Other

286 voters have answered this question.

If you would not have your son circumcised, check all the reasons you would leave him intact.

87% (92) Foreskins are natural
55% (58) You think it looks better
72% (76) You want him to have more sensitivity
48% (51) Your are uncircumcised and happy
43% (46) Its the trend of the future
88% (93) Its his body to live with, not yours
61% (65) You don't want him to suffer the pain of having his foreskin cut off
15% (16) Girls prefer a foreskin
22% (24) Other

105 voters have answered this question.

This poll was created on 2004-03-10 06:41:26 by coolguy30