9/11

There aren't enough "in-between" answers. For example, when you ask what should be done with Bush and other government officials, the only option is to either praise them lavishly or to impeach them and charge them with treason (both of which are stupid - he HASN'T done a good job and he HASN'T committed a provable crime, either). How about "nothing" or "a swift kick in the $%!@ on his way out in '09?"

I see your point on the in-between answers; I should have provided more, particularly in the question you cited. However, I in terms of the answers that say he's done a good job and that he should be impeached, are you denying that there are those out there that hold that opinion? I was curious to see what percentage think that way. Also, why is impeachment so far-fetched? You say he has not committed anything that is "proveable"? How do you know, until there is an adequate and full investigation of the President by Congress? And, don't forget that impeachment is merely articles drawn up against the President and can be drawn up for as "little" an offense as losing the confidence of "we the People". Impeachment resulting in removal from office can only be determined by the both branches of the Legislature, and usually the Senate is the branch that holds back, as it did with Clinton.