Punishment For Rape

I think castration is sufficient. A useless $%!@ and no balls is the worst fate for a man I think. But also, for some strange reason the balls are hugely sensitive to pain and happen to be hanging around, so I think the victim or the victims nominee should take the opportunity to inflict torture on those balls......I know its what all my friends agress....get the nuts of him quick by squeezing not cutting !

Eurogirl.

I disagree... Most men tend to view their $%!@ with an almost mystical awe. In talking to guys about punishment for rape, some will grudgingly admit that physical castration might be appropriate punishment. But if you mention the idea of removing the $%!@, they consider it to be too extreme. (At this point in the discussion, in fact, they tend to look rather ill and try desperately to change the subject.) That alone would make me think that cutting off an offenders $%!@ would be the most effective punishment. It is true that the balls are very sensitive to pain. By cutting off the $%!@ and leaving the balls intact, you have eliminated the possibility that he will ever rape another woman. But those sensitive balls will still be availible for painful torture, prolonged squeezing, beating, electro-shock, etc. Besides, if his balls have been removed, you have also removed your best method of self-defense against him (kicking or kneeing him) in the event that he should try to attack another woman... What do you think about this Tammy?

Meri ========== In Reply To ========== I think castration is sufficient. A useless $%!@ and no balls is the worst fate for a man I think. But also, for some strange reason the balls are hugely sensitive to pain and happen to be hanging around, so I think the victim or the victims nominee should take the opportunity to inflict torture on those balls......I know its what all my friends agress....get the nuts of him quick by squeezing not cutting !

Eurogirl.

Hi Meri

Thanks for visiting my poll.

I totally agree with you! I am of the opinion that it is better to remove the guy's $%!@ instead of his nuts. This not only eliminates his ability to rape a woman, but will also provide a life long punishment as he will still have a sex drive, but no outlet for it.

Plus, as you say, there is more of a fear among men over losing the $%!@. This should make it more of a deterrant for would-be rapists.

Tammy

========== In Reply To ========== I disagree... Most men tend to view their $%!@ with an almost mystical awe. In talking to guys about punishment for rape, some will grudgingly admit that physical castration might be appropriate punishment. But if you mention the idea of removing the $%!@, they consider it to be too extreme. (At this point in the discussion, in fact, they tend to look rather ill and try desperately to change the subject.) That alone would make me think that cutting off an offenders $%!@ would be the most effective punishment. It is true that the balls are very sensitive to pain. By cutting off the $%!@ and leaving the balls intact, you have eliminated the possibility that he will ever rape another woman. But those sensitive balls will still be availible for painful torture, prolonged squeezing, beating, electro-shock, etc. Besides, if his balls have been removed, you have also removed your best method of self-defense against him (kicking or kneeing him) in the event that he should try to attack another woman... What do you think about this Tammy?

Meri

I think the victim should get to put the rapists balls between to wooden blocks and then crush them by sitting on the blocks ========== In Reply To ========== I think castration is sufficient. A useless $%!@ and no balls is the worst fate for a man I think. But also, for some strange reason the balls are hugely sensitive to pain and happen to be hanging around, so I think the victim or the victims nominee should take the opportunity to inflict torture on those balls......I know its what all my friends agress....get the nuts of him quick by squeezing not cutting !

Eurogirl.

wait a second if the gy's $%!@ is cut off then how will he pee. he would die of his urinary bladder bursting ========== In Reply To ========== Hi Meri

Thanks for visiting my poll.

I totally agree with you! I am of the opinion that it is better to remove the guy's $%!@ instead of his nuts. This not only eliminates his ability to rape a woman, but will also provide a life long punishment as he will still have a sex drive, but no outlet for it.

Plus, as you say, there is more of a fear among men over losing the $%!@. This should make it more of a deterrant for would-be rapists.

Tammy