Obama or MCcain

I bet none of them will even get out to vote anyway

I'm probably not going to bother voting myself, but if I do it won't be for the guy who's been in the Senate for 5 minutes and has the MTV vote locked down.

I'm 35 years old you twit; so, your MTV crack does nto apply... dolt

I'll put the question to you then...

If your daughter was raped... would you allow the rapist to have a say in the developement of that child/ How about the people who support the rapist?

I thought not.

Based on the crap you just posted, you made a great case why you should have no say in the next election.

You're zero for nothing. Want to try again?

Sure idiot... here ya go...

What are the cast of characters in a rape or gang rape?

The Helpless Victim= Iraq The Rapist= Bush administration The cohorts of the rapist= Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice, Rove The Enablers= Blair, McCain, Graham, Giuliani, Palin, Limbaugh, Lieberman, Romney The Duped= Republican and Democratic leaders and spokespeople in the house and Senate The weapon of choice= The troops The collateral victims= the American people, the peoples of the world, the innocent bystanders

The result of the rape= pregnancy, an unwanted responsibility and a difficult dilemma. Prosperity of Iran and North Korea and Venezuela, as well as elements of violent extremist religious fanatics, and hardline Chinese and Russian nationalists. Source of Analogy= Condi Rice's statement that Iraq was just suffering the birth pangs of a new democracy

Parallel tragedy= 9/11 as caused by an unconnected assailant Attacker = Osama Bin Laden Helpless victims= 9/11 families, friends, and the people of the world and America Enablers= Bush Administration due to lack of foresight and Criminal negligence towards pre-terrorist attack memos and intelligence reports Motive for invading Iraq= Unconnected attacks on 9/11

What we have is a case of gang warfare that resulted in too difficult a target in the form of a mobile assailant known as Osama Bin Laden, Essentially a gang leader and mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, being set aside to exact revenge for old grievances against an unrelated, but offensive ganglike element in another area of 'da hood", and truthfully, a less difficult target. Revenge paid in blood for the satiation of the masses thirst for it.

In essence, Gang leader 1 attacks and kills target; Grieving neighbors too afraid to deal with original assailant, instead rape assailant's neighbor as revenge against genuine and noble desires of the victims neighborhood; Assailant's neighborhood is now faced with an unwanted pregnancy; all members of the issue want to do what is best for the victim and the baby, but some, like John McCain and his chosen running mate Gov. Palin, Duped enablers of the rape and the continuance of that rape, want to "help" by taking the responsibility of handeling the weapon of choice, the troops,unto themselves. A happy tactic for them since they still hold the rape weapon against those who would better use it to the betterment of the victim and the newborn responsibility. This helps relieve them of the responsibility of admitting their involvement in the rape. the victim is certainly distraught, pressured, and needs time to collect thoughts and make a reasoned rational decision, but feels threatened by weapon still leveled at head, even if by well meaning, ignoramouses.

So the questions we must ask ourselves are these...

If it were our own daughter who had been raped, would we allow the rapist a pass to continue the rape, even if the rape is doen in a more gentile manner? Will we, even as we support rape victim and bouncing baby democracy, allow the rapist to continue to have a say in any future development of the newborn? Will we allow the rapists friends to have a say? Is it correct, moral, just, or ethical, to simply pass the weapon of choice off to the rapist friends in order that they may care for the child? Should we continue tactics that only redistribute power to a different set of gang members, and that only serve to strengthen the misguided perceptions of the gang members initially responsible for the original attack on 9/11? Is it "Just" or even logical, moral or reasonable to assume we can solve the problem of the original assault, by raping someone near in geography, say, in the same neighborhood, to the home of the true assailant, and the only one that we as residents of the victimized neighborhood have a right to prosecute, or should we instead focus our energies on getting the original source of the crime.

Can we really pass the mantle of leadership onto John McCain and Governor Palin, those who stand by and cheer and support and encourage the continuance of the original act that the rapist Bush Administration has engaged in? Is it just to pass the weapon of choice, our troops, to the rapist friends simply because they had no direct hand in the rape? Should we give the rapist and his friends a pass because their tactics happen to have been effective while that weapon of choice is still leveled at the victims head, on the basis that we should look on the bright side? After all...

the Iraqis ARE getting a bouncing baby democracy out of it.

Got any other flippant remarks? Please... dazzle us with your grand intellect that regards my correct assertions as crap, by reasserting your original hollow criticism without first considering the analogy.

And to correct your assinine assertion... I'm 1 for 1. Me 1; you =zero.

Understand basic math? Or do I have to explain that to you as well?